"William Dembski, a mathematician and philosopher at Baylor University and one of ID's (Intelligent Design) chief advocates, asserts that: ' . . . any view of the sciences that leaves Christ out of the picture must be seen as fundamentally deficient.'"

But the advocates of the view of science known as Intelligent Design don't think that this means that they are creationists, and that "biological evolution is a theory in crisis, fraught with numerous plausible-sounding failures, most of which are recycled from overt creationists. It is 'only fair,' the ID case continues, to present alternatives so that children can make up their own minds. Yesterday's alternative was 'Flood geology.' Today's is 'design theory.' "